In my youth 40K was only ever a passing interest, with its fantasy cousin proving far more of a draw to our gaming group, but my older self sees the Rogue Trader universe as a brilliant but flawed creation. Mostly I can happily continue to shun it and stick to my orcs and dwarves, until something like Axiom's astropath grabs my attention.
The setting's brilliance is in how it frames "medieval in space" as vaguely plausible, and hence allows table top battles between space-faring civilisations, without the technical levels being so mismatched that the only possible conflict is asymmetric. At least within the Imperium.
But you can only pull that "technology is religious mantra" trick once, so where does that leave our other standard races?
Orks
I like orcs probably more than most, but let's be clear - orcs are not a spacefaring civilisation (or arguably even a civilisation at all!). In orcish society there is none of the standing on the shoulders of giants that's needed for any sort of technological process. Let's be generous and say that their limit is muzzle-loading firearms.
Who knows how orks came to be spread through the galaxy from their home world, or even if they had a home world - maybe they were seeded widely by the Old Slann? When they travel through space now it's in the retinues of Renegades, or mercenary commanders keen to make use of their love of battle. Occasionally an exception individual will rise to lead a mercenary company themselves, but when that individual is killed or toppled the remnants of the company may well find themselves stranded on whatever world was the scene of their latest engagement.
So, orks have no space fleets or dreadnoughts of their own, and their vehicles (invariably wheeled or tracked) have a Heath Robinson appearance which reveal their cobbled-together origins and are highly unreliable.
The occasional wealthy mercenary my have carapace armour, and a mercenary company will often be outfitted in a moderately uniform fashion, although there will always be the odd lucky individual with a prized favoured weapon (usually loud = good!). Conversely though there will also be units where the prime weapons have been lost or gambled away and hence the slowest and weakest members end up mustering with clubs, muskets or bows.
"Native" orks on frontier worlds will be even more variable - any more advanced weapons will be the spoils of previous battles and raids, with primitive firearms in the hands of the majority.
Eldar
With Eldar the paradox is in the other direction - they're in decline, in terms of numbers and ambition, but they still have the full capabilities of their civilisation. There are hints in the Rogue Trader rulebook of their mysterious abilities, including mastery of the warp, but in combat they're on a par with, if not somewhat more fragile than, the Legiones Astartes. It seems that any serious encounter between the Imperium and the Eldar should be more akin to Arnie and his team meeting the Predator!
Clearly the Imperium's xenophobia isn't going to accept that they're in any way superior - of course they're decedent - but do recognise that they have abilities bordering on witchcraft. So, to take a leaf from Arthur C. Clarke, I'd suggest that all craft world Eldar (including dreadnought and vehicle pilots) be treated as psykers with the following abilities -
- Telekinesis (level 1)
- Jinx
- Hide (level 1 Elementalist spell)
All abilities should automatically succeed, with no need to test against or track psi-points, but for points value purposes assuming they have 20. Hence your basic Eldar now costs 68 points (without equipment).
These powers are technical rather than psychic in nature though so aren't detectable as such. They're consequently not always available to mercenary Eldar (50% chance) or pirates (25% chance of having these abilities).
I've no idea what these ideas would be like in actual play - in fact I'm sure that in purely commercial terms the direction taken with the rules of effectively having a level(ish) playing field is a more sensible solution. But in my head as big a degree of disparity as possible feels so much more "right".
I don't think that your approach to rationalising the RT universe 'sucks all of the fun out of it'. I think that treating Eldar as a rare but incredibly potent species is perfectly in keeping with the mythopoeia's tone. I started a RT project last year, but it has been on hold for many months now. When it does eventually restart I will undoubtedly introduce concepts of my own, which is (or, perhaps, was), after all, part of the fun of fantasy gaming!
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteThose were the days - "It is for you - the gamesmasters and players - to use this information as you see fit. There's nothing to prevent you from expanding or altering the material given. In some cases this will be necessary..." :)
If anything I'm de-rationalising the universe - it's almost impossible with our modern mindset to really wallow in how irrational and god-fearing the inhabitants of the Imperium should be. Especially with some of the slicker illustrations such as the Logan's World bikers. What mantras did they say before starting up their steeds, or even when turning on a light switch?
Dunno - you can take the whole thing too far. But it's interesting to prod at it a bit.
This is a great analysis - I love this sort of thoughtful approach to the game. As Gaz says it doesn't suck any life out of anything. That was one of the great things about Rogue Trader - it was so big and have covered in shadow that you had to fill in some of the blanks yourself.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I think you've hit on a great idea: differing technology levels can be balanced out by biological robustness. Orcs multiply like rabbits or bedbugs, so they spread across the universe like wildfire even though they can't manage their own transportation. And Eldar have incredible technology but can't reproduce any more, so their numbers offset their technological witchcraft.
Anyway, great post.
I'm hoping I can come up with some interesting scenarios which incorporate different technology levels while still providing a decent game. There's been some great discussion on the topic over at the Oldhammer forum, while I think it's fair to say there have been some contrasting opinions on the whole thing it's given me some great food for thought.
DeleteAs you say the RT universe is a big and complex place, I'm sure there's room for what I'm trying to do. It's a shame the evolution of the game has been more towards "standard" battles, especially with some of the great setup work in the book itself, but I think that was inevitable really. On the other hand I'm sure there's some fantastic, varied stuff out there already, just not receiving the attention it deserves.
G+ pointed me to this post vaguely on a similar theme - http://www.lounge.belloflostsouls.net/showthread.php?52397-Abaddon-s-40K-Bolter-Is-Rubbish
ReplyDeleteSome of the references are a bit new for me (like post-1990!) but one of my take-aways from it is that there's plenty more scope for asymmetry. Well worth a read.